data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1bfe/e1bfe79c544e9c543e39d46ca7670ad058480d42" alt=""
After setting a height of around Rm 2.40 in January 2008, it went down all the way to 32 sen by March 2009. I am taking the 32 sen low as the end of major wave (II).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14cc5/14cc52f12378e9ac7d3ab51df05acc491e6131e7" alt=""
Since March KNM has completed 5 waves to form its wave 1 at Rm 1.06 on June 5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37ba9/37ba988049ffe5fdda6b7edf776d474c80e85c32" alt=""
Since then, it has formed a 3-3-5 corrective waves a-b-c to completed its wave 2 as shown above. KNM is currently in early part of sub-wave i of wave 3. It can be named 1-dot & 2-dot of sub-wave i.
As usual, there are many other possible ways of counting, but I shall monitor KNM along this hypothesis until such time the hypothesis can no longer hold.
The magnitude of wave 1 is 74 sen, if the magnitude of wave 3 is the same as wave 1, the target for wave 3 is Rm 1.43. If wave 3 takes the magnitude of 1.618 times of wave 1, the target for wave 3 can be 1.618x74 + 69 = Rm 1.88
It may be good to look at other possible wave counts.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e9a4/9e9a4b031a9ce4474fb6ae33d63cc43acd96b97d" alt=""
Case A is what I have discussed above.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/453cb/453cb33fa8788e31464c2429fb1841a324a54366" alt=""
Case B is an a-b-c-d-e wave 2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05222/052223df7d4a0e1b139893baa863a8cae211b054" alt=""
Case C is as shown above which is unlikely as the sub-wave i has only 3 waves and not 5 waves. But it has happened before in the past, the unlikely or the so called impossible option turns out to be the correct one ultimately.
No comments:
Post a Comment