Go Back to Australia Lynas

Go Back To Australia Lynas

It is only logical that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) declared that the plant is safe as Lynas plant has adopted the safety procedure and guidelines established and recommended by IAEA. To say that it is not safe is equivalent to say that the IAEA guidelines on radiation safety is not safe.

This whole checking exercise is merely an invitation to IAEA to check and see whether Lynas has complied to IAEA rule of safety that IAEA claimed to be safe.

Who has checked and audited IAEA's safety guidelines ?? The guidelines were formulated by IAEA and approved by IAEA.

Lynas Chairman, Curtis has refuted allegation in New York Times report which claimed the plant had construction and design flaws. Someone should follow up on this.

Please click Design Flaws to read more.

"Mr. Curtis, if your plant is very safe as you have claimed, why were you not allowed by your Australian Government to set up a plant beside your mine to process your rare earth in the great Austrlian desert????".

"Why you have to spend so much money to ship them over 4000 km to Kuantan for processing???? No business sense right???".

Assuming IAEA guidelines is flawless, to adhere to the guideline from A to Z is going to cost Lynas tons of money, who can ensure that the Lynas Giant will do A to Z many years down the road??? We all know too well the story of law enforcement and $$$$$ in this boleh land.

Chernobyl was supposed to be safe

Fukushima was supposed to be very safe too

One final question

"Why set up the plant in Kuantan??"
"Why not George Town, Kota Bharu, Shah Alam or Ipoh??"

The answer

"Pahang people very lovely mah, you give them toxic waste they still vote for you mah".

YOU SEE Soooo LOVELY

.